Krishnamurti
Photograph
by Edward Weston
The
Throne That Was Christ’s
Chapter from the book God is My Adventure by Rom Landau - 1936 :
I
ONE
SUNDAY MORNING I SAT IN A SMALL PANELLED ROOM IN ONE of those fine Queen Anne
houses that are still to be found in certain parts of Westminster. The street
outside the window was deserted. It was raining hard, and the lowering sky
robbed the room of the few bright colours that some roses in a vase and an old
chair covered with tapestry had introduced into it. The house belonged to the
Dowager Lady De La Warr, and I was waiting to meet Mr. Jiddu Krishnamurti, who
was staying there on a short visit.
This was to be my first
meeting with Krishnamurti. The young Indian was supposed to be rather shy, and,
in view of all the sensational reports about him in the newspapers, I did not
find this in the least surprising. I had determined to come' to this meeting
with an open mind, but I must confess I found it hard to feel anything but the
profoundest scepticism. I recalled several of the strange tales that I had read
in the course of the last few days. One of them remained in my memory with
particular vividness, though it described an event that had taken place almost
twenty years earlier. It was an account of a convention at Benares, and its
author was at the time private secretary to Krishnamurti, then aged fifteen.
He had written: "The line of members began to pass up the central passage .
. . with a bow to the Head [Krishnamurti]. . . . The whole atmosphere . . .
was thrown into powerful vibration. . . . All saw the young figure draw itself
up and take on an air of dignified majesty. . . . The approaching member
involuntarily dropped on his knees, bowing his head to the ground. . . . A great
coronet of brilliant shimmering blue appeared a foot or two above the young head
and from this descended funnel-wise bright streams of blue light. . . . The Lord
Maitreya was there embodying Himself in His Chosen. Within the coronet blazed
the crimson of the symbol of the Master Jesus, the rosy cross . . ." I am
afraid I did not read on much farther after the "rosy cross"; but I
was told that the writer of these impressive lines was not the Only one who
claimed to have seen this colourful performance.
There
seemed some justification for an attitude of scepticism, and as I sat waiting I
experienced a feeling of superciliousness which we are all occasionally apt to
indulge in when we know a particularly weak spot in the life of the person we
are going to meet. In me this feeling had been strengthened by the fact that I
had read in a newspaper only the night before that Krishnamurti's followers in
Holland had finally proclaimed him the "World Teacher". He himself had
uttered these words:
"Krishnamurti
has entered into that life, which is represented by some as the Christ, by
others as Buddha, by others still as the Lord Maitreya. . . ." These words
had put the conscience of Krishnamurti's followers at ease and had induced them
to proclaim him once and for all "The Vehicle of the Lord". For
ordinary people this was, to say the least, alarming news.
I was thinking of all
these strange things while I was looking on the empty street half hidden by the
heavy drizzle. I had plenty of information about Krishnamurti's life to counterbalance
my scepticism. I knew that some of the people who stood behind him were
seriousminded and intelligent.
I had come across the
name Krishnamurti directly Only a few weeks previously at the house of Lady De
La Warr at Wimbledon, where I had met some of his most intimate friends
experienced elderly men and women who were not at all the sort of people to be
bluffed. The centre of the group was Mrs. Annie Besant, then almost eighty years
old and a most attractive person, very bright and untheosophical, full of
political and intellectual interests, which she expressed in a most lively and
amusing manner. Next to her was Mr. George Lansbury, the veteran labour leader.
He too was preoccupied with Indian and other political problems. There was very
little to suggest a religious ecstatic in his slow, deep-voiced pronouncements.
Anything more solid, more natural, could hardly be imagined. Even our hostess
mentioned the subject of theosophy only casually. Then there was a member of
Parliament who, I believe, was an Under Secretary of State; he was evidently a
great authority on India. There was nothing exalted or mystical about the other
people in the room. These were Krishnamurti's closest friends in England. It was
difficult to imagine these people talking of the "great coronet of
brilliant blue" and "the rosy cross of the Lord Jesus". Annie
Besant herself was obviously a very shrewd woman. Though I knew little about her
or her work at the time, I could see that there was not much in life that had
escaped her.
II
And then Krishnamurti
entered the room. He walked towards me with an inviting smile, and we shook
hands. I was immediately struck by his remarkably handsome face, and after a few
minutes' conversation I was equally charmed by his attractive personality. These
two impressions were very strong, and I suppose they determined in some ways my
future attitude towards him. I heard later from other people that their first
impressions of Krishnamurti were the same as mine.
My former
superciliousness gave way to a feeling of pleasure. At first I thought that this
feeling was due to the aesthetic delight caused by his appearance.
Indeed, he was much
more handsome than his photographs made him appear. He seemed no older than
twenty-two or twenty4hree, and he had the slender grace of a shy young animal.
His eyes were large and deep and his features finely cut. His head was crowned
with thick silky black hair. But it cannot have been the aesthetic impression or
the musical quality of the voice alone that had put me at ease so quickly. He
was obliging, though reserved; but in spite of this after half an hour's
conversation he made me believe that I had known him most of my life; and yet
there was nothing particularly easygoing about him, though there was a
pronounced feeling of balance and proportion in his manner. And there was an undercurrent
of human warmth which was responsible for the atmosphere of spiritual intimacy
between us.
These were my first
impressions of Mr. Jiddu Krishnamurti of Adyar, Madras, India; Castle Eerde,
Ommen, Holland; Arya Vihara, Qjai, California and the Amphitheatre, Sydney,
Australia.
III
Jiddu Krishnamurti was
born in 1897 at Madanapalle in Southern India. He was the eighth child of a
Brahmin family. His father Narayaniah had a minor post in the civil service, and
afterwards became an official at the headquarters of the Theosophical Society at
Adyar, Madras. One day in 1909, when litde Krishnaji was bathing in the river
with his younger brother Nityananda, the Rev. Charles Leadbeater saw them. Mr.
Leadbeater was Mrs. Besant's closest collaborator and one of the leaders of the
Theosophical Society. He talked to the boys and invited them to his bungalow.
And now something took place which was to affect not only the life of the two
Jiddu brothers but equally that of many thousands of people all over the world.
Mr. Leadbeater discovered that the older boy Krishnamurti was none other than
the "Vehicle of the new World Teacher, the Lord Maitreya" whose last
incarnation on earth had apparently been in the person of Jesus Christ.
Now, this was a most
extraordinary discovery for anyone to make, even for a theosophical leader of
some fame. Charles Leadbeater, however, not Only believed in his vision but even
convinced Mrs. Besant of the truth of it; and then began a series of events,
almost unparalleled in modern history. Krishnamurti was to be prepared for his
mission, and both he and his brother Nitya were taken into Charles Leadbeater's
charge
-Nitya merely as a
playmate for his more exalted brother.
As there had previously
been some gossip about Mr. Lead-beater, the father Narayaniah demanded the
return' of his two boys. The former notoriety of Mr. Leadbeater seemed to have
outweighed in the father's estimation the possibility of the future fame of his
own son. There followed long struggles out-side and inside the lawcourts. Mrs.
Besant was appointed guardian of the boys, and excitement upon excitement kept
newspaper correspondents busy for a long time until eventually Charles
Leadbeater had to leave India, and the boys were sent to England. They were to
receive an education that would complete the beginnings made in India, and that
would prepare young Krishnaji f6r his future activities in the Western world.
The cheap publicity
caused by Krishnamurti's association with Mr. Leadbeater entirely overshadowed
all that had been favourable to the boy in that association. Krishnamurti
himself admitted in later years that thanks to Mr. Leadbeater he had enjoyed all
the privileges of an all-round education, combining the best of Eastern and
Western methods. Such an education is usually available for only a few Indians.
Thanks to Mr. Lead-beater, he had been rescued from a life of poverty and from
the unhealthy conditions in which he had been reared and brought up and removed
to surroundings that were beneficial to both mind and body. Krishnamurti also
admitted that Mr. Lead-beater was always the most considerate guardian, and that
he was never anything but the teacher anxious for the spiritual and bodily
happiness of his pupil. In view of the slanders that followed Mr. Leadbeater for
many years it is important to State these facts as they really were.
Meanwhile in India a
new society, "The Order of the Star in the East", had been formed. Its
aim was to provide the necessary platform for the message of Krishnamurti,
"to proclaim the coming of a World-Teacher and to prepare the world for
that event". Most of its members were theosophists. With Mrs. Besant they
believed deeply in the truth of Charles Lead-er's visions and in the part that
Krishnamurti was to play the future history of mankind. Nevertheless certain
small tions of the Theosophical Society found it impossible to subscribe to the
new doctrine, and felt obliged to leave the movement. The German branch of the
Theosophical Society not only disapproved of the Krishnamurti legend but broke
away altogether under the leadership of Rudolf Steiner.
There is another
version of the origin of Krishnamurti's "divine mission". Hardly
anyone knows it, and I heard it for the first time from Ouspensky; yet, since
its source is impeccable, I shall quote it, even though Krishnamurti himself
does not seem to know it.
According to this
version, Leadbeater's original "vision" was pure invention. Together
with Mrs. Besant he is supposed to have believed that a young human being
brought up as a "messiah"-educated in an appropriate manner and
supported by a world-wide wave of love and the implicit faith of great masses of
people-ought to develop certain Christlike qualities; and it appears that
Leadbeater and Annie Besant believed to the very end that Krishnamurti was thus
developing naturally into the personality of the "World Teacher".
The difference between
the generally known and the above version is not quite as large as it appears to
be at first-for in both cases Leadbeater and Mrs. Besant did not claim that
Krishnamurti was the messiah but that
about twenty years preparation would be necessary for him to develop into the
"perfect vehicle" for the messiah. In either case they seem to have
had no doubts as to the successful result of their method.
From 1912 to 1922
Krishnamurti and his brother lived in England, being educated partly at private
schools and partly by tutors. They used to spend their holidays with Lady De La
Warr, who became a sort of guardian to them. Krishnamurti was intended for
Cambridge, but, when it appeared that the university authorities were loath to
accept a youth of his unique fame, it was decided that he should go on studying
under private tutors.
He was intelligent and
keen, and seemed to absorb Western learning with much greater zest and with even
better results than does the ordinary English boy. Though certain influences
during his early youth at Adyar may have been detrimental to him, there is no
doubt that the spiritual training that he had to undergo in those years and the
feeling of grave responsibility that had been instilled into him had a good
effect. In England Krishnamurti was as popular with everyone who came into touch
with him as he had been in India. His personal charm, which had impressed me in
the first minutes of our meeting, must have had the same effect on other people.
The influence of a woman of Mrs. Besant's wisdom and experience was, no doubt,
also beneficial. There are many people who felt rather hostile towards Mrs.
Besant, and perhaps not without reason, yet few have doubted the sincerity of
her intentions and the power of her intellect. Such a mentor was bound to leave
strong impressions upon the mind of a sensitive youth.
After the year 1921
Krishnamurti began to lead a more independent life. He travelled extensively;
he gave up more and more of his time to writing poetry, and also he wrote
articles the many international publications of the "Order of the Star”.
Those were the days when Krishnamurti began to make friends with people outside
the auspices of the Theosophical Society and the shadow of his own renown. He
laid the foundation of many valuable friendships with men of letters, artists,
and musicians, who were all attracted by the charm of his personality.
Perhaps
the closest friendship and the most interesting to us - was that with Bourdelle,
the French sculptor. After the death of Rodin, Antoine Bourdelle was considered
the leading French sculptor, and his fame extended far beyond Europe. In the
days when the friendship between the old artist and the Indian youth had fully
matured, L'Intransigeant published a
report of an interview with Bourdelle. Bourdelle had been greatly impressed by
Krishnamurti at their first meeting, and had subsequently modelled a large bust
of him. He always considered it one of his most important works, and I
remember that, in a posthumous exhibition of Bourdelle's sculpture in London,
the bust of Krishnamurti had the place of honour. "When one hears
Krishnamurti speak one is astounded," said Bourdelle to the representative
of L'Intransigcant; "so much
wisdom in so young a man!" Evidently Krishnamurti was a personality even
without the labels that had been attached to him by his ardent followers.
"There is no one in existence", Bourdelle went on, "who is more
impersonal, whose life is more dedicated to others. . . . In the desert of life
Krishnamurti is an oasis.
Krishnamurti's greatest
following was in England, but it was interesting to note the impression he made
on the French, who are, as a race, usually hostile to spiritual manifestation's
that cannot be defined in terms of logic. Nowhere have there appeared so many
valuable books and articles about Krishnamurti as in France. Frenchmen of an
artistic disposition were the first to whom his personality appealed, quite
apart from his fame or his supposed mission in the world. The blend of a
beautiful appearance and a sensitive personality was bound to impress people
with the artistic and intellectual fastidiousness of the French. Krishnamurti's
exotic personality was no doubt an added attraction in the eyes of his French
admirers.
Equally typical as his
popularity in France was the suspicion with which he was regarded in Germany.
The very fact that Krishnamurti's message came in a foreign language limited the
extent of its influence. In the first place it could Only appeal to those
Germans who understood English. These were mostly people of a higher education,
and they expected to find some clear philosophical structure in a spiritual
message. It was the class that had been interested in Steiner, in Keyserling, in
Stefan George. For the intellectual appetite of these people there was not
enough solid fare in Krishnamurti's gospel, and his aesthetic assets were here
of little avail.
In 1925 the
Theosophical Society considered that the moment had come for Krishnamurti to
acknowledge his destiny in more 'formal fashion, and this official recognition
accordingly took place during the celebration of the jubilee of the Society.
Theo'dore Besterman, a biographer of Mrs. Besant, describes most 'effectively
the central scene of the proceedings: ". . . In the shadow of the great
banyan tree in the grounds of the Adyar headquarters, Mr. Krishnamurti was
addressing some three thousand assembled delegates. . . . A few of those present
had been warned what to expect, and these communicated their excitement to those
around them. The whole audience was in sort of state in which the individual is
merged in the mass-revivalist psychology. . . . The words of the speaker became
ore and more urgent. 'We are all expecting Him,' he said; 'He will be with us
soon'. A pause, and then, with a dramatic change from the third person to the
first, the voice went on, 'I come to those who want sympathy, who want
happiness. . . . I come not to destroy but to build.' . . . And afterwards Mrs.
Besant said that 'the voice not heard on earth for two thousand years had once
again been heard'."
It was now decided that Krishnamurti should have something more than
the merely spiritual sphere of influence which provided by the "Order of
the Star", and various pieces of land were purchased for the establishment
of enormous camps in different continents. A suitable territory was bought in
the Ojai Valley in California, where people from all over America could gather
for yearly meetings at which Krishnamurti would deliver his message. California
was particularly dear to Krishnamurti's heart, since it was here that his
beloved younger brother Nityananda had died a few years earlier. For the Australian
followers there was erected the Amphitheatre in Sydney; for the Indian friends a
camp in the Rishi Valley. A Dutch nobleman, Baron Philip Pallandt van Eerde, an
enthusiastic admirer of Krishnamurti, put at his disposal his Castle Eerde at
Ommen in Holland with its old gardens and extensive grounds. Eerde was to become
Krishnamurti's European headquarters, and here his European followers were to
assemble at a vast camp meeting which was to be held every summer.
In January 1927
Krishnamurti spoke at a meeting in California, and concluded his speech by
reading one of his recent poems, which ended with these words:
"I
am the Truth,
I
am the Law,
I
am the Refuge,
I
am the Guide,
The
Companion and the Beloved".
The imaginative reporter
of the Theosophist added to this a
poetic summing up of the situation: "As the last words were uttered there
was a sprinkle of light rain that seemed like a benediction and, spanning the
valley, a perfect rainbow arch shone out." Meanwhile Mrs. Besant was
travelling from country to country, giving lectures to packed halls and speaking
in her masterly way of the new World Teacher.
Many details of this
extraordinary "life story" flashed through my mind when Krishnamurti
entered that room. But after half an hour's conversation with him I was willing
to forget most of the reports I had heard. The picturesque story of his life
seemed to me no longer of much importance. How right I was I could not foresee
at the time.
We parted friends, and
I accepted an invitation to come to stay with Krishnamurti at Eerde. There I
should meet his friends from all over the world; and, besides listening to his
public speeches, I should also have an Opportunity of further personal
conversation.
IV
I actually went twice
to Eerde in the course of the summer. The first time I could only spend two or
three days there, so I .decided to visit Krishnamurti again in a month's time,
when I should be able to Stay at least ten days, and witness the huge gathering
of theosophists and members of Krishnamurti's own 'movement. There would be many
visitors from the United States, from India and even from Australia.
To
a writer of fiction the atmosphere at Eerde would prob~bly offer the most
attractive material. I could imagine all sorts books inspired by it -
psychological, devotional, religious, romantic, hysterical, lyrical, satirical.
How tempting it would have been for a novelist to describe the little castle, an
elegant .g of the early eighteenth century rising up from a moat connected with
the "mainland" by a delightful semicircular terrace; the romantic
canal spanned by a decorative stone bridge; long low pavilions on each side of
the castle; the formal circular garden in front of it. And what Opportunities
were offered by the ancient park around the castle, its dignified avenues, its
magnificent trees, its fields, its river, its water roses on the pond!
And then
the guests themselves, wandering reverently along the garden paths, discussing
under old trees the deepest problems of life, and greeting one another with
smiles of forgiveness and looks of understanding.
There were fair
Scandinavian girls with transparent complexions, and voices so soft that they
seemed incapable of saying any but the holiest of things. Some of them helped in
the kitchen, others in the offices, and in the evenings they sat together and
held one another's hands. Though I have not found out for certain, I imagine
that they were "disciples" who had been driven by faith to leave their
comfortable homes in Oslo or Stockholm and to come to the castle to work for the
common good. There were several Americans in whose mouth the masters, gurus and
astral worlds used to lose all their ethereal qualities and become convincingly
matter of fact. There was a very learned French lady with at least three
daughters who looked as though they preferred the Côte
d'Azur to the Dutch scenery, but had to content themselves with their mother's
knowledge of all sorts of devas, Chinese saints and Tibetan gomtchengs. There was an Italian countess who was always telling me
of yet another dream she had had about Krishnamurti; and there were several
elderly English ladies, quiet, kind, helpful, and wearing a surprising amount of
jewelry, though their jewels, even if less obvious, were in a way like the
taboos and charms of African Negroes, made of lions' teeth 'or human bones,
since although they were mostly of gold and often of precious stones, their
triangular or circular shapes showed clearly that they were worn for their
symbolical significance and not in order to satisfy a craving after beauty. Then
there were several Indians of indeterminate age but obviously higher education,
who at night would sometimes appear in their attractive native coats, with
tight white trousers and coloured shoes, the envy of their American, Dutch,
British and Scandinavian brethren, many of whom wore homely sandals and looked
altogether less picturesque. Some charming Australians and Anglo-Indians and a
Scottish couple completed the houseparty.
The
writer of fiction would have found even better models and more vivid "local
colour" in the large camp, situated in the woods a couple of miles outside
the castle. Such readers as have ever attended a theosophical or practically any
sort of religious convention will know the type, and I shall refrain from
describing it at length. They generally abhor the idea of meat as violently as
that of wine or tobacco; they look deep into your yes when they talk to you;
they have a weakness for sandals, for clothes without any particular distinction
of shape, for the rougher kind of textiles and such colours as mauve,
bottle-green and purple. The men affect long hair, while the women keep theirs
short. There were several workmen and farmers among who had been saving up their
money for several years in order to come here. Two German youths had walked for
two or three weeks from a distant part of Germany. Indeed, the three thousand
visitors would have been worthy of a much more gifted pen than mine.
The
organization of the camp lay in the hands of a few Dutch followers of
Krishnamurti, experienced business men, who had succeded in turning out this
model camp city in the midst of uninhabited forests and fields. Tourists and
journalists from many countries arrived solely to visit the camp, and organizers
similar gatherings would come from distant countries in order to learn from the
organization at Ommen. There were rows upon rows of tents of all sizes; there
were shower baths, attractive huts with post office, bookshop, photographer,
ambulance and information bureau. In huge dining-tents excellent vegetarian
meals were served; there was a lecture tent with seats for three thousand people
and there was even an open-air theatre. Everywhere one found helpful guides and
interpreters and a fine spirit of fellowship.
As the Dutch summer was at
times trying-with incessant rain and icy winds-the nerves of the people must
have been somewhat strained. Harmony could be achieved only by self-discipline.
Ignorance of the language was, no doubt, a tiresome handicap for many people.
Some of them must have come merely for the sake of a new experience and for
human fellowship, for the Serbs and Russians, South Americans, Rumanians,
Turks and Greeks who hardly knew one word of English could not understand one
word of the lectures. And yet most of them remained happy till the very last
day. This was undoubtedly due, to a very great extent, to the efficiency of the
organization.
As I did not live in
camp, which I visited only for the lectures and an occasional meal, I knew the
routine of life at the castle much better.
V
Since the castle itself
was not large enough to accommodate the twenty or more personal guests of
Krishnamurti, most of us were put up in the long pavilion flanking the castle.
Besides Krishnamurti and his closest friend Rajagopal, the head of the whole
organization, Only a few friends stayed within the castle itself. The diningroom,
library, reception rooms and offices were on the ground floor. In the reception
rooms there were several attractive pieces of Dutch furniture, and the main
room, called the state room, contained, besides some fine panelling, four
handsome Flemish tapestries specially made 'for the' castle. An ingeniously
constructed wooden Louis XIV staircase led from the entrance hall to the first
floor and to the bedrooms.
The former owner of the
castle, Baron van Pallandt, was a quiet middle-aged gentleman, who had kept for
himself only one or two of the castle rooms. He went on administering the big
estate, and all the secretarial, clerical and household work, besides that of
organizing the movement itself, was done voluntarily.
I
stayed in one of the two pavilions, where all the rooms were alike - simple,
attractive and comfortable. Every visitor had to look after his own room and
make his own bed. When, however, after a day or two some kind spirit had
discovered that my talent for manual domes'tic work was more original than
effective, my services in this direction were no longer expected, and the
remainder of my stay there, whenever I returned to my room after breakfast, I
found that my bed had already been made with enviable skill.
In the
morning we assembled in the big state room. We took our shoes - more experienced
guests than myself would appear in bedroom slippers-and sat down on the floor to
meditate. Perhaps it was my native cynicism that prevented my enjoying the
morning meditations as much as I ought to have done. It always put me into the
wrong frame of mind.
There
were several problems connected with the morning meditations about which I
wished to be enlightened. Of course I might have asked any of the other twelve
or fifteen fellow guests attending this service, but I could never summon the
courage to do this, for fear lest they might find out how ignorant I really
was. I wanted to ask them whether they considered necessary to meditate in a
crowd. I sincerely believed in meditation, but I always found it much more
successful in solitude or with a single companion. Just when I was getting into
the t frame of mind, one of the meditators must needs sneeze cough, and
thereupon all my limited powers of concentration would be dissipated.
And
I should have liked also to ask whether it was essential to sit on the floor
without having been instructed previously how to do it. Most of us had been
brought up in the Western world, and were not used to Eastern attitudes. I found
that my attention had to be directed towards my aching spine and ankles, and a
good deal of the energy that was wanted for a better purpose was thus wasted.
Eastern postures for meditation are taught solely by the yoga of body control,
and can be learnt successfully only in the far East. Of the eighty-four
different postures for the various meditations, only the first few have ever
been achieved by any European. Even the elementary "lotus posture"
which is indispensable to meditation done in the pose adopted by my fellow
meditators, can only be comfortably assumed after many patient and painful
exercises. How, then, could I expect all these people, most of whom had never
been to the East, or undergone the essential training, to have the necessary
command over their bodies? I could see for myself that hardly one of them was
sitting in the correct attitude-that of intertwined ankles and straight spine.
Possibly the worst indication of my own immaturity was to be found in the fact
that the sight of all these people sitting there in stocking feet always evoked
in me a schoolboy propensity for practical joking.
Had it not been for my
shortcomings, the morning meditations would undoubtedly have provided me with
a source of inspiration. Someone read aloud a' few words-I believe it was always
one of Krishnamurti's sayings-and after that we were meant to meditate upon it.
The tightly shut eyes of the other guests made me feel very envious of the
wonderful ten minutes they were spending on some blissful plane.
From the state room we
moved into the diningroom for breakfast, which was always an enjoyable meal,
with excellent honey and delectable nut pastes. Lunch, too, was a very attractive
meal, not only by virtue of the quality of the vegetarian dishes but equally
because hunger, and the pleasure of satisfy-it, induced many of the guests to
cast off their reserve and show greater individuality of character than
conversation at other times had led one to expect.
As a rule everyone
attended to his own wants, but I was often permitted to wait on Annie Besant,
and I several times had the privilege of sitting next to her at meals, and each
time it was a joy to be near this exceptional woman. There was a childlike
quality about her-not the childishness of old age, but rather essential
simplicity and happy disposition of childhood You felt that she knew so much
more than anybody else present; but her greater wisdom and experience never
interfered with her manner of treating even the youngest members the party as
her equals.
The saintliness that
hung over Eerde, like a pink cloud in a play, made me somewhat sceptical; and
yet the first meeting between Annie Besant and Krishnamurti on her arrival at
the had greatly impressed me'.
Krishnamurti had been
waiting for the car that was bringing his guest, in the circular garden in front
of the castle. He was himself, and we, his other guests, kept in the background.
One could see that he was nervous. When the car arrived, Krishnamurti walked up
to it to open the door. Annie Besant apeared, dressed in white Indian robes with
white shoes, and a white shawl over her snow-white hair. Krishnamurti bowed his
and kissed the old lady's hand. She in her turn put both hands on his black hair
and whispered a few words to him. In her face there was the expression of the
deepest tenderness, and I could see that she was crying. It was obvious that
their welcome was an expression of their personal affection for each other and
had nothing to do with their theosophical relationship. Krishnamurti took
Annie Besant's arm and led her slowly towards the castle. We were introduced to
her and shook hands. Her eyes were still moist and the loving smile was still
lingering on her lips.
Krishnamurti hardly
ever came down to breakfast. Generally he remained in his bedroom. It was a very
simple bedroom, and must have been the smallest in the castle. Each morning
after breakfast some of his most intimate fellow workers used to walk up the
staircase and disappear into a room which connected with Krishnamurti's
bedroom. My curiosity was pricked by these morning processions. I imagined
mysterious happenings behind the doors: special initiations or mental
exercises of a higher order, reserved only for the "inner circle". I
never found out what went on behind the doors-probably household bills and
questions of daily routine were discussed.
In the mornings and on
most afternoons there were lectures in the big tent in the woods. Krishnamurti
spoke almost every day; and then there followed speeches by Annie Besant, Mr.
Jinarajadasa, the vice-president of the Theosophical Society, a Frenchman Prof.
Marcault, a Dutch scholar Dr. van der Leeuw, and one or two other followers of
Krishnamurti. The main tenor of Krishnamurti's talks was that the kingdom of
happiness lies within ourselves, and the other lecturers spoke on very much
the same lines. Krishnamurti's principal talks were of an autobiographical kind,
and he tried to explain in them how he himself had found truth by giving up all
conventional conceptions of life one after another.
There were several
meetings at the castle in the afternoon, and often at these there were visitors,
both legitimate and also of a less legitimate but more intrusive kind. Many
people from the camp would come to see the home in which their prophet lived.
They were taken inside the castle and along the quiet garden paths, and they
often hardly dared utter a word. There were also sightseers and tourists, who
had heard of the new messiah from India and who would peep through the gates as
though expecting Strange miracles to occur at any moment. They looked at
Krishnamurti's guests, apparently convinced that we were the disciples of a
magician or of a yogi. Each time I left the castle or came back, I noticed the
inquisitive glances of the occupants of some motor car, and I would hear their
interested chatter. This embarrassed me and made me wish that I had the power to
produce white rabbits from my coat pocket or flames from my mouth, since I
always felt as though the people in the cars were not being treated with that
consideration to which they believed themselves entitled.
In the hall of the
castle there was a very large and very new gramophone, given to Krishnamurti by
one of his admirers and placed here for the enjoyment of the guests. I knew that
Krishnamurti was a great lover of music, and I caught him one evening
sitting by himself in the corner of a little study off the main hall. It was
after dinner and the room was quite dark. I can still remember the record: it
was the slow movement of the G Minor Quartette by Debussy-that almost unreal
piece of strangely coloured cascades and sudden melancholy halts. Whenever I
hear that movement I see the night over the castle and Krishnamurti sitting by
himself in the little room and listening joyfully to the violins.
Several members of our houseparty
were fond of music, and would spend the evening listening to the gramophone. The
prevailing taste seemed to be Parsifal,
Götterdämmerung
and
Siegfried. The listeners would sit in
just those attitudes in which you would have expected to find them, when
revelling in the superior boredom of Kundry's endless laments or Siegfried's
narratives. Their eyes were closed, their souls no doubt very wide open, in
their faces was a mixture of happiness and reverence, and you could see all
the silver and mauve ethereal pictures that the music painted for them. Perhaps
I was too frivolous for them, and at times I would become genuinely alarmed by
my cynicism, and would decide never again to make critical comments even to
myself. And yet there was one thing which gave real cause for a certain
irritation.
VI
My inability to find the
true meaning of Krishnamurti's teaching led to the anxiety that my visit might
be an utter failure. Krishnamurti's lectures were too vague to give me clear
answers to any of my questions.
I had been hoping to find
those answers among the people who stayed at the castle and who must have known
exactly what was to be understood. They were only too willing to help me; but it
seemed to me that they had all sacrificed their personalities in order to become
members of the Order of the Star in the East. I talked to many of them in the
course of the day, but they left too little impression to enable me to
distinguish them in my mind later on. They all met me halfway; and they would
talk of reincarnation and karma with
an understanding smile on their lips and as though they were speaking of the
next train from Ommen to the Hook of Holland. They did their very best to copy
Krishnamurti, to be kind and sincere or to make jokes and show how jolly they
were. But I was not among doctors, farmers, schoolmasters, politicians,
housewives; I was just among theosophists and members of the Order of the Star.
I had expected that their new spiritual experience would have made them more
enlightened about their former problems; that they would talk with greater
understanding about the world at large. There were political and economic
congresses, religious disputes, naval conferences going on all over the world;
new movements in art, in literature,
music, the theatre, the cinema were being experimented with; the world talked of
unemployment and reparations; there were thousands of things that had to be
discussed, improved upon-but none of them seemed to ,have penetrated the woods
of Eerde.
One day I was told that
the moment had arrived when Krishnamurti's message would be heard by the
outside world which had hitherto known it Only through distorted newspaper
reports. A new organ was to be founded. My opinion was sought, since I had had
some experience and enjoyed press connections that might be helpful. The
publications of the Order of the Star-periodicals, pamphlets and
news-sheets-were run by amateurs. I knew that the outside world could Only be
reached if one were to use a language intelligible to it. Devotional poetry,
accounts of personal visions were not likely to convince men and women used to a
matter-of-fact world. Those lawyers, business men, theologians and scientists
of the outside world would only grasp Krishnamurti's ideas if they could be
presented in a clear and sober way. People must see that they were dealing not
with dreamers but with men who knew the world and her better than others did,
and who therefore might be able solve some of the most pressing problems.
The few people with
whom the plans were discussed listened patiently to my suggestions; they nodded
obligingly, and assured me that this was the right way to proceed. In actual
practice not one of these suggestions was adopted, and the events of following
months showed that a metaphorical and semi-theosophical jargon was still being
employed for enlightening world at large about the "World Teacher".
VII
I am sure that none but
myself was to blame for my intellectual disappointment. The general atmosphere
of adoration had put me into a state of expectancy which simply could not be
satisfied anyhow or by anyone. My intellectual upbringing had made me expect a
clearer message than Krishnamurti was willing or able to offer. I had not yet
found in his friends and followers that inner readjustment to life that would
have allowed me to accept the new message in the form in which it was offered.
I had gathered enough to see that
Krishnamurti's teaching was not Eastern-that it repudiated passivity. Everyone
should find truth for himself; should listen to no one but himself; should
consider unification with happiness as the final goal. But when I asked how this
could be achieved I received no clear answers. It is not enough to see the
summit of Mont Blanc. If we want to reach the top, we must be informed as to the
most advantageous season, the best route, and such details of equipment as the
most suitable boots to wear. Most of Krishnamurti's answers would be dissipated
in similes and metaphors. You asked him about your personal troubles, your
religious beliefs, your intellectual doubts, your emotional difficulties, and he
would talk to you about mountain peaks and streams running through fields. When
asked about his own road and the road along which one might find happiness, he
would answer: "The direct path, which I have trodden, you will tread when
you leave on one side the paths that lead to complicati6ns. That path alone
gives you the understanding of life.... If you are walking along the straight
path, you need no signposts." But where, exactly, the direct path lay, or
how we were to find it, he did not disclose. The very same day Krishnamurti
might renounce all paths and say that no one path was better than any other.
I had several talks
with him, and each time I eagerly looked forward to our meeting. We would talk
as we walked through the woods and across the fields of Eerde. One afternoon we
suddenly found ourselves in front of a charming little house, flat roofed and
rather modern, surrounded by high trees but with a view on one side' across the
fields. It was Krishnamurti's retreat, a self-contained little home, where he
could get away from people, meditate and rest in solitude. He must have been
very sensitive to solitude. He was not very strong physically, and though he
went in for all sorts of games and was a great lover of lawn tennis, he remained
rather delicate. The camp with its thousands of people, with its daily lectures,
interviews and visitors, must have been a heavy strain on his health.
I found no further
intellectual satisfaction either in Krishnamurti's lectures or in his books,
and I wondered whether this was not due to his Eastern origin. On the other
hand, I had experienced no similar difficulties when reading the writings of
Eastern sages. Even if one did not grasp their full meaning, there still
remained enough to provide intellectual contentment. Among the books by
Krishnamurti that I tried to read were Temple
Talks, The Kingdom of Happiness and The
Pool of Wisdom. There were also a few volumes of poetry. I admired their
oriental beauty and their deep ring of sincerity, but I was baffled by their
vagueness. It is certainly unfair to judge lyrical poetry by the same rules as
those by which we attempt to judge scientific books. On the other hand
Krishnamurti's poetry was supposed to contain not only the lyrical confession of
a sensitive youth with the gift for poetry but also the account of a deep
experience. When I read:
"As
the flower contains the scent,
So
I hold Thee,
0
world,
In my heart.
Keep
me within the heart,
For
l am liberation
And
happiness.
As
the precious stone,
Lies
deep in the earth,
So
l am hidden
Deep
in thy heart…”
I
enjoyed the beauty of the poem and I felt the truth in it. But this poem, called
"I am with thee" and written in 1927,
was considered by Krishnamurti's followers and even his biographer Lilly
Heber as of great importance. I seemed to remember having seen poems of that
kind in various anthologies containing Eastern poetry. At times you would even
find such poems in those slender volumes published by young men who had come
down from Oxford and Cambridge and had been greeted by some of the London
critics with prophecies of a splendid literary future.
But we were not dealing
with a talented young man whose earlier poems had been accepted by the Editor of
the Oxford Outlook. We were dealing
with a teacher who did not repudiate this title; who allowed thousands to come
and listen to him and to expect guiding principles from him, and who must have
been conscious of the immense responsibility that all this implied. I felt that
I had a right not only to expect answers but even to expect them in a language
that I could understand; in a language that was common to people of the
Western world. I even felt entitled to expect perfection in everything he said ~
did. The unity between the content and the form was of great importance in a
person like Krishnamurti. When I read:
"Thou
must cleanse thyself
Of
the conceit of little knowledge;
Thou
must purify thyself
Of
thy heart and mind;
Thou
must renounce all
Thy
companions,
Thy
friends, thy family,
Thy
father, thy mother,
Thy
sister and thy brother;
Yea,
Thou
must renounce all;
Thou
must destroy
Thy
self utterly
To
find the beloved,"
I could see a glimpse
of Krishnamurti's philosophy, but I felt the same truth might have been
expressed less pretentiously: "Thou must purify thyself of thy heart and
mind. Thou must renounce all thy companions, thy friends, thy family, thy
father, thy mother, thy sister and thy brother . . ." If we write these
lines without the lineal demarcation of poetry we acknowledge at once the fine
statement contained in them, but we do not maintain that they are poetry. And
yet I wanted Krishnamurti to write poetry that would convince people, and such
as I might show to my sceptical friends.
When after a certain
time I was able to perceive the main idea of Krishnamurti's teaching I
understood that it was complete liberation, which means complete happiness. It
is achieved by love and it rests within our own inherent power. Krishnamurti defined
it in later years when he said: "The goal of human feeling is love which is
complete in itself, utterly detached, knowing neither subject nor object, a love
which gives equally to all without demanding anything whatever in return, a love
which is its own eternity".
As far as I understand,
this is the teaching of Christ, the teaching of Buddha. We all heard these words
when we were given our first religious instruction. I asked myself, therefore:
If Krishnamurti's teaching is just a repetition of the teaching of Christ, or of
Buddha, then why all this theosophical background; why the Star in the East,
that huge organization; why the talk of a new path; why the followers, camps and
labels? Would it not have been wiser to remain in our old-established Churches
which give us clearer words for all these messages? Is it all humbug?
I was very fond of
Krishnamurti, otherwise I should have left Eerde after the first few days. But I
wanted Krislmamurti to be able to help me in my own way, and to help the other
three thousand people in their own way. I wanted to be able to convince the
cynic within myself that Krishnamurti was right and capable of helping, and that
he had fulfilled my highest expectations. Instead, I felt uncomfortable when
the Saul within myself would say to the Paul after every talk I had with Krishnamurti:
"Wasn't I right? Did you grasp more today than yesterday? Didn't I tell you
it would be a waste of time? Why don't you talk instead to the rivers and the
trees? Their language will be more intelligible."
And yet there were
people, with less intellectual resistance, who perceived Krishnamurti's message
quite clearly. Looking back on those days I am particularly struck by the
impression Krishnamurti made on a man brought up in the rough school of English
working-class life, a man matured in political battles. I mean George Lansbury.
This is what the old labour leader wrote after one of the meetings at Ommen:
"I have seen the glorious march of the Socialists in Paris, in Brussels, in
Stockholm and in our own country, and I have seen them sitting and standing
round our platform. But I think that these gatherings round the camp fire . . .
are somehow the most wonderful sight of all. . . . When we Socialists come
together, we come together pledging ourselves to fight in order to raise the
material conditions of ourselves and our fellows. Round this camp fire we were
listening to one who is teaching us the hardest of all truths . . . that if
mankind is to be redeemed it must be redeemed through the individual action of
each one of us. .
There
must be great hope for the future . . . whilst there are living in our midst
those who are inspired by a great ideal-to work and toil for impersonal
causes."
I hoped that Mr.
Lansbury was right, and that some of the characteristics that I seemed to have
found among Krishnamurti's followers were only evident when they were all
together. They may have talked and behaved in quite a different manner when left
to themselves in their normal surroundings. Perhaps all these people were really
leaders in their various professions, efficient and capable of reforming their
individual worlds in a direction that had disclosed itself to them during their
visit to Eerde. Perhaps it was only due to blindness on my own part that even
when I saw them later in London at one or two gatherings and in several offices,
I again had the impression they had given me at Ommen.
Though my intellect
remained critical, I felt that I was indeed becoming happier every day through
my contact with Krishnamurti, and that only intellectual barriers within myself
prevented me from accepting him as wholeheartedly as I longed to do. But even
this reaction irritated me. I knew that the three thousand people who had come
here were as anxious to catch his smile and were almost in a fever every time
Krishnaji, as they called him affectionately, addressed or approached them. I
had imagined myself more critical than they.
VIII
Only the evenings round
the camp fire were really impressive. After dinner we would drive out in cars
belonging to members of our houseparty to the camp fire in the woods. A large
amphitheatre had been built there, with innumerable circular rows of seats; in
their midst was .Krishnamurti's own seat. This was made of large tree trunks and
suggested some huge Nibelungen throne. Each time I saw this seat I imagined
that Wotan and Hunding and the many substantial valkyries must have sat in such
chairs when attending a family party in Valhalla. Krishnamurti, slender, dark,
rather shy, looked strange and lost on his Wagnerian throne.
Most of the people who
had come to the camp at Ommen looked upon the evening gatherings, quite rightly,
as the climax of the day. Krishnamurti, stepping into the centre of the amphitheatre
where a huge heap of wood for a beacon had been prepared, would kindle it and
stand in front of it for a few minutes watching the fire grow higher and higher.
Then he would walk back slowly to his seat. Smoke would begin to rise to the sky
and the flames would suffuse thousands of eager faces with a red glow. Many
members of the audience were sitting with their hands resting quietly in their
laps and their eyes shut, and you could see how deeply they enjoyed the moment.
In the evenings there was a festive feeling, there was an atmosphere of human
fellowship and spiritual satisfaction. It was a real holiday to the three
thousand people. On one or two occasions the light of the flames and the last
pink of a sun that had disappeared more than an hour ago would merge into each
other and would produce striking colour effects in which, I daresay, some of the
people present discovered symbolical meanings.
I
have never heard Krishnamurti speak so well as he did in evenings round the camp
fire. On the whole he was not a very effective speaker; he often repeated
himself; he often halted; and many of his sentences were too long. His hold over
masses was not due to any forensic talents. In the evening time his
words seemed to come more easily to him, and his voice carry melodiously
across the silent crowd, the pictures by his words becoming more clearly visible
and the atmosphere more convincing.
Now and then he would
begin an Indian chant at the end of evening, and on such occasions he was even
more impressive during his speech. Though he spoke English with mastery, could
not help feeling that English was not his language. It I remember thinking at
the time, the melodious quality of voice that
may have given that impression. At the evenings round the camp fire the contrast
between his entire personality and the English language would become more
striking. In the he wore Indian clothes, a simple brown coat reaching below the
knees and buttoned up to the neck, tight white trousers and white shoes, and his
appearance would only emphasize the emotion produced by his voice. During the
Indian chants the precise meaning
of his words seemed to matter little, and there was no longer a gulf between the
man and his words. In the unintelligible language there was the magic sound that
words assume in a strange tongue.
After his chants
Krishnamurti would sit silently for a few minutes, with an expression of great
serenity on his face. He d then leave his seat and walk away to the car that
took back to the castle.
IX
The other incident is more difficult
to describe. I had been trying for a long time to meditate in the evenings on a
particular subject. I used to do it in bed before going to sleep. For months on
end I would reach a certain point in my meditation after which k would break up.
Either my attention would falter or else I fell asleep before getting beyond the
particular point. A few days after I had met Krishnamurti I succeeded for the
first time. I experienced the feeling of sinking into a deep well. Though the
well seemed bottomless I had simultaneously the two opposed sensations of going
on sinking and yet of having reached the bottom. This was accompanied by a very
vivid impression of light. The strongest impression, however, was of receiving
at once an emotional shock and a mathematical revelation. It is difficult to
describe this last sensation: no metaphor or comparison represents it correctly.
Though I do not claim any mystical significance for my experience, I can best
translate it into words by quoting an
abler pen than my own. When Dean Inge once described mystical experiences he
said: "What can be described and handed on is not the vision itself but the
inadequate symbols in which the seer tries to preserve it in his memory.
. . But such experiences, which rather possess a man than are possessed
by him, are in their nature as transient as the glories of a sunset. . . .
Language, which was not made for such purposes, fails lamentably to reproduce
even their pale reflection." What, however, can be said is the fact that
the culminating point of my experience made me unspeakably happy. It was such
an acute happiness that it was almost like a feeling of physical delight or
physical pain. The division between delight and pain seemed lifted. How long the
moment lasted I could not tell; but I imagine it to have been no more than the
fraction of a second. When it was all over, I was awake and fully conscious, and
I recorded my experience to myself with a feeling of deep gratitude.
The above experiences showed me that Krishnamurti's effect upon me was vital enough to act even against my intellectual resistance.
X
In the
summer of 1929 I found in a newspaper
a report whicli at some length how Krishnamurti had suddenly dissolved the
Order of the Star, broken deliberately all connections with the Theosophical
Society and their teaching about himself, and renounced all the claims that had
been made in his name. He had, then, at last summoned the courage to sever all
the ties that had held back his own spiritual convictions through so many years,
and that had forced him to act in the shadow of what looked like spiritual
usurpation.
The recent
rupture had taken place on 3 August 1929 at
the yearly summer camp at Ommen. Krishnamurti decided to renounce all the
authority that thousands of people had been using as comfortable crutches for
their own spiritual incapacity. This is how Mr. Theodore Besterman described the
critical meeting in his biography of Mrs. Besant: "One morning Mr.
Krishnamurti rose to deliver his address to the assembled campers. It could be
seen at once that he was now speaking for himself and 'not merely as a
mouthpiece; and his words confirmed the impression in no dubious manner. . . .
He announced the dissolution of the Order of the Star and at one blow laid low
the whole elaborate structure so painfully and painstakingly built up by Mrs.
Besant during the past eighteen years. 'I maintain', Krishnamurti said, 'that
Truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path whatsoever,
by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of view and I adhere to that
absolutely and unconditionally. . . . A belief is purely an individual matter,
and you cannot and must not organize it.' He declared that he did not want
followers . . . he made it unmistakably clear that his words were directed
against those who had built up the elaborate structure for him during those
eighteen years. Krishnamurti added: 'You have been preparing for this event, for
the coming of the World Teacher. For eighteen years you have organized, you have
looked for someone who would give a new delight to your hearts . . . who would
set you free. .In what manner has such a belief swept away all the unessential
things in life? In what way are you freer, greater? . .
Mr.
Krishnamurti continued: 'You can form other organizations and expect someone
else. With that I am not concerned, nor with creating new cages. . . . My only
concern is to set men absolutely, unconditionally free'. After this Mr. Krishnamurti
gave up all the possessions heaped upon him, and gradually severed his
connection with all organizations."
It was not
difficult to perceive what enormous courage it needed to make such a
far-reaching decision. To understand its magnitude one has to remember what
Krishnamurti was renouncing. There existed an organization with many thousands
of members; there were platforms from which to speak in the four most important
corners of the globe; there was an independent commercial organization with
its magazines, its books and various publications in a dozen different
languages; there were helpers among all classes of society, willing to make
practically any mental or material sacrifice; there was, in short, a working
machine for the transmission of a spiritual message, as powerful as any
institution had ever been. To understand what it must have meant to give it all
up, one has to visualize the money, the worry, the energy, the time needed for
the establishment of an organization for the disseminating of non-commercial ideals,
no matter whether of a religious, social, political, intellectual or any other
kind. To throw it overboard as though it meant nothing required personal
courage, moral purity and spiritual conviction.
I
was glad that I had doubted neither Krishnamurti's sincerity nor his intrinsic
spiritual value. The events of August 1929 strengthened
the impression I had received when the young Indian entered the dark
panelled room in Westminster. Had I not suddenly seen that it mattered little
what his life had been up till then? And had I not felt that his personality had
nothing in common with the striking headlines in the newspapers?